I DONT HAVE TIME TO PLAY WITH WEAK PEOPLE I WIONT FALL FOR YOU
BY BY NOW STAND UP TIME WE TAKE BACK OUR NATION FROM THESE CORP LEADERS WHO HELP GIVE OBAMA ANY THING HE WANTS AND DESTORES OUR NATION I AM DONE THE GROVES ARE OFF TIME FOR THE WAR
Op-ed: Benghazi...the only 'scandal' that can really take Obama down
Benghazi...the ghosts of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty haunt me at times...haunt me because I know they CANNOT Rest in Peace while their killers roam free to continue to NOT only dishonor their memory but also to dishonor the soul of 'We the People'.
While I am NO investigative reporter I can connect the dots, and I can through deductive reasoning see truth hiding in a pile of nonsense...and 'We the People' are being fed just that...nonsense...by the Obama administration. And the worst part is that Barack HUSSEIN Obama and those who orbit around him know we know and simply don't care.
Over this almost year since that fateful night I have written many opinion pieces on the happenings at the consulate and given my supposition of why Benghazi happened in the first place...supposition first based on nothing but a gut feeling immediately after it happened but now being given credence by a chain of events that just CANNOT be ignored. I will now link them altogether and you tell me if what is my truth...(that Ambassador Stevens found out Obama was running guns and weapons to the al-Qaeda supported Syrian rebels under-the-table and was going to expose him, and so had to be silenced before he could)...is not 'THE' truth.
In the days and weeks leading up to September 11, 2012 Ambassador Stevens sent numerous e-mails to Washington, specifically to Hillary Clinton's State Department and to Hillary herself, begging for help for he was nervous after the thankfully failed attempt on the British Ambassador's life, but that these e-mails were ignored or deemed NOT relevant.
Now for the Obama version and time frame with my 'truth' in red italic.
According to the Obama bunch, the American consulate at Benghazi was attacked on September 11, 2012 by aspontaneous group of protesters(in reality it was attacked by a heavily armed muslim terrorist group comprised of between 125 and 150 gunmen using rocket-propelled grenades, RPGs, hand grenades, AK-47s, FNFT2000 NATO assault rifles, diesel canisters, mortars, heavy machine guns, and artillery mounted on gun trucks). The attack began during the night at the compound built to protect the main diplomatic building. A second attack early the morning of the next day targeted a nearby CIA annex in a different compound, and that's where the four Americans died...but in reality where three Americans died (for Ambassador Stevens did NOT die there as claimed, he died after being taken very much ALIVE from the consulate and at the direct hands of the enemy for the bloody hand prints on the consulate walls are from someone who is being carried trying to hold on to whatever they could for dear life...as witnessed by the finger streaks pointing into the consulate...and in pictures showing a 'supposedly' dead Stevens having his left arm shielding his eyes or wiping tears from them, and dead men do NOT shield or wipe tears from their eyes).
Washington was informed about the attack just as it was beginning at about 9:40 local time (3:40PM Eastern Time). By 4:30 Eastern, Pentagon officials informed Defense Secretary Leon Penetta and Obama about the attack. The Pentagon then ordered an unmanned drone to fly over Benghazi. The drone arrived at 11:10 pm local time (5:10 pm Eastern Time) and began a video feed to Washington. At 5:41 pm Eastern Time, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Patreaus to decide on a course of action...a course of action that amounted to NO help whatsoever (and here is where it starts to get dicey for Penetta, Clinton, and Obama all insisted that military forces were too far away to get to Benghazi in time to help. These three spoke an hour or so after the start of the attack yet Panetta told the Senate, under oath, that at that time the decision was made that help would NOT get to Benghazi in time...and to that I say how could they know that NO help would get there in time because how could they know how long the attack would be going on).
Telling his staff to handle the 'incident' occurring at Benghazi, Obama went to bed (or so he claimed)while the attack was still ongoing saying he had to leave early the next morning for a fund raising trip to Las Vegas. (Now here is what I find odd...what were Obama's whereabouts in the 8 or so hours he claimed to be sleeping and why knowing there was a phone in his bedroom did he, the president of the United States NOT ask someone...anyone...to keep him abreast of the deteriorating situation at the consulate knowing Americans were in danger. Did he really go to his bedroom NOT to sleep but to contact someone in Libya to make sure Stevens was dead...remember my supposition previously stated...and if so who did he contact during those hours, because his total lack of concern for his diplomatic staff is quite unnerving leading one to believe his actions heralded the start of a cover-up.).
Could Obama always have known that an attack would happen and what the outcome of the attack would be (because he knew what had to be done to Stevens) and the time frame it would occur in, thus allowing him to leave when he did, so he could say, 'I had nothing to do with whatever went wrong and you can't prove I did because I was in bed sleeping'. From Obama's track record we know where his loyalties truly lie I would NOT doubt for a minute that his actions or lack thereof speak volumes for remember, the following morning, even after finding out the tragic outcome of the night's events, off to Las Vegas he went.
Between September 11th and 17th, eight other diplomatic missions in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe were subjected to violent attacks (supposedly)in response to that poorly done YouTube video that criticized mohammad. And remember when on September 16, 2012, US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice went on five Sunday morning talk show circuit peddling the Obama approved 'talking points' that the Benghazi attack occurred because of said video (which she knew very well was NOT the case as those 'talking points' were changed at least 12 times to correspond with Obama's movements on that fateful night.).
And after it was proven that NO video of any kind had anything to do with what happened at Benghazi the blame game started, but instead of putting the blame where it belonged...as on Barack HUSSEIN Obama and Hillary Clinton...we were treated to Hillary's testimony before the House Committee investigating the Benghazi attacks. Remember when she said (after recovering from her 'boo-boo') the words that stunned the nation, “With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?” “It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again.”
Remember how the Obama bunch then tried to shift the Benghazi blame onto our military for their lack of response, but thankfully along came the whistleblowers to set things right when it was revealed that orders to 'stand down' were given so that our military could NOT respond to the attacks...and orders to 'stand down' could only come from the White House.
Remember when whistleblower Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the US Embassy in Libya, told congressional investigators that there were two possible courses of action that could have saved American lives that night...allowing US special forces to enter Benghazi and flying a fast-moving U.S. military aircraft over the scene of the attacks...and remember that a team of US special forces in Tripoli was blocked from flying in to attempt a rescue of the embassy personnel...remember when we found out that that a Marine anti-terrorist team based in Rota, Spain, was ready to go assist in Benghazi, but reports claimed that it would have taken them 23 hours to get there when the truth is it would have only taken 3 hours and 5 minutes to get there.
Remember all that and now remember all the diversions to keep our attention off of Benghazi...the scandals...scandals ranging from the AP scandal to the IRS scandal to NSA scandal...each and every one used and manipulated to keep us away from the fact that only Benghazi is a true arrestable offense...that only Benghazi is grounds for treason being leveled against both Barack HUSSEIN Obama and Hillary Clinton...that only Benghazi is treason for aiding and abetting the enemy as in my supposition of Obama secretly running guns and weapons to the al-Qaeda supported Syrian rebels...and that supposition has now become an in-our-face reality that we taxpayers are footing the bill for.
So it's NOT Hillary's job to figure out what happened the night of September 11, 2012...it's 'We the People's' job to make sure that those who were indeed complicit in Benghazi are brought to justice...and that really boils down to Barack HUSSEIN Obama and Hillary Clinton...and only when that becomes reality can the ghosts of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty finally Rest in Peace.
TIME TO STOP OBAMA BEST WAY IS LETS GO AFTER THEM ALL FOR aiding and abetting
EVERY ONE START NOW REPORT EVERY ONE OF HIS PROTECTORS FOR AIDING AND ABETTING HIS CRIMES FROM hillary cliton aiding and abetting protecting obama over benghazi
Roger L Simon @PJMedia has a column out which essentially predicts a new set of whistleblowers who will soon present to congress.
[...] According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.
Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.” (link)What is interesting is the affirmation of what we have shared from the VERY BEGINNING.
The State Dept. (Stevens) was buying back Surface to Air Missiles, from the Libyan ”Rebels”, who were actually al-Qaeda. The CIA was a logistics facilitating co-agency supporting the efforts of the State Dept. but the CIA did not fully support the larger goal. Nor should they.
What the article does not outline is what also we have previously shared which connects the dots.
The Libyan missiles were in the process of being re-directed from Benghazi al-Qaeda into the hands of Syrian Rebels using Turkey as the middle-men to keep the Obama’s fingerprints off the transportation and delivery.
That’s why the Turkish delegation was at the U.S. Benghazi compound that night meeting with Ambassador Stevens. The Turks were able to leave the neighborhood, around 9:00-9:15pm shortly before the attack commenced at 9:40pm.
AFRICOM Commander, General Carter Hamm, was stuck betwixt a rocket and a hard place. Already the Afghanistan and Iraq U.S. forces had lost their close-air-support due to the risk from the Libyan SAAM’s which had already made their way into those specific areas of combat operations.
The CIA/DoD were not big fans of giving the Libyan “Rebels” the shoulder fired missile capacity from the outset. The CIA out of fear of passenger aircraft being targeted, and the DoD because they rightly knew the missiles would eventually be used against our troops in other areas. Looking at what happened in Afghanistan, Iraq, they were right.
After the Benghazi assassination of Stevens the realized fears of both CIA and DoD became a risk to both Hillary Clinton and President Obama. [Both Obama and Clinton were sympatico on arming the rebels - they made it happen].
The risk to both Obama and Clinton was from the CIA and DoD being questioned, and/or revealing on their own what was going on, and why they did not like the plan from the outset. (*note* That risk actually still exists today)
How would it look if General Carter Hamm and General Petraeus were saying openly, publically, they did not like the original idea?….. Against the backdrop of a dead U.S. Ambassador, who was trying to buy back weapons we gave the bad guys, against the advice and warnings of both CIA and Military DoD ?
Even without the election, which just amplified the inner circle election fear exponentially, the entire construct of the Obama/Clinton Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Doctrine was openly, and potentially, about to be hung around their neck.
[Remember it was Samantha Power (wife of Cass Sunstein), Susan Rice, and eventually Hillary Clinton who convinced Obama to ignore the advice of his Office of Legal Council, send troops to Libya without congressional approval, and then ultimately ARM the rebels with the same weapons we were now trying to: a) take back, and b) divert to the next insufferable folly called Syria.]Why was Susan Rice specifically selected to take those heavily manipulated talking points? I just told you in the prior paragraph. This Libyan Quagmire was her baby too – she was instrumental in it.
If the potential existed for Hillary/Obama to take a fatal career hit, it makes sense they would pull in the ideological co-dependent enablers with them. Everyone needed to have skin in the game, and self-preservation by all would mean a greater likelihood of covering success for both Hillary and POTUS.
Samantha Power bailed out. Lucky for her and Cass the pregnancy and child-birth gave her an out. He ran along beside her vacating his regulatory position in the world of Obama Czars.
DoD risk? General Ham was just dispatched by the civilian command and fired/replaced.
CIA risk? General Petraeus was dispatched in a more Machiavellian maneuver. After all the Eric Holder DOJ through the FBI had been building the ‘just-in-case’ file for quite a while (all summer).
So pulling the trigger on that embarrassment was a no-brainer.